Alfred Tiley is my maternal grandfather, and when all is said and done, a little bit of a mystery, as not much is known about him. The bare bones of his story are that he was born in 1879, the 11th (surviving) child of a family of 12 children; his mother was almost 43 when he was born in Lambeth. At the time of his birth, the family lived in
Alfred's father, James, seems to have remained steadily employed throughout his life, 'in the print'. His mother presumably had her work cut out to fend for the large family on a printer's wage, but both parents lived to the ripe old age of 90, so hard work didn't kill them.
Alfred's occupations seem to have ranged from one correspondent's report that he worked for flour company Spillers and Bakers in Southwark, to recorded census records stating he was a Labourer, to painting and decorating, to Carpenter's Mate. During the Great War he served as Corporal 201290 301st Reserve Labour Company (HospitalAttendant). Financially, after marriage, life must have been a struggle as he had felt unwell for some time before he died, collapsing on an omnibus on the way to work and dying in hospital- he couldn't afford to take time off work or to pay for a doctor in those pre NHS days.
My mother's memories of him were few, given he died when she was so young. The story was told to her that when he married my Nan, he moved into the family house in
Policeman: is everything all right, Missus?
Great Granny: I hope so. My boy hasn't come home, and I am worried about him
Policeman (sensing some trouble): Is there anything I can do to help? How late is he? How old is he?
Great Granny: He's 31
Policeman: Missus, get back inside. He's old enough to find his own way home when he's ready!
Soooooo, at that stage I thought we had a simple and straightforward story of a youngest son born into a large family with elderly parents and oldest siblings old enough to be his parents, constantly employed, worn out and driven to an early grave by a life of poverty, remaining cheerful under miserable circumstances, possibly dogged by ill-health but finding family contentment later in life, happy to take on the care of another man's children in addition to his own beloved daughters.
Then one day I received a surprise letter from the late lamented family researcher Brent Springate, who was descended from Alfred's oldest sister. A tireless and generous genealogist, and a former police officer, he had uncovered something which was completely incompatible with all I had ever heard.
Alfred had a criminal past.
On 24th May 1904, aged 25, Alfred Tiley, Labourer, was up before the Magistrate at Newington (Westminster) having been charged at 8.20pm on the 23rd (incurring a doctor's fee of 3/6) with 'Assaulting William Blanks by striking him on the head with a walking stick inside the Rose and Crown Beer House, High Street'. He was bailed at 11pm on the 23rd.
He was subsequently sentenced to 2 months' hard labour, which was appealed, according to a note attached to the record.
Dated 26 July 1904, the note reads:
"Sir
Alfred Tiley
Conviction by Horace Smith Esq., dated 24 May 1904 for unlawful assault. Sentence 2 months hard labour.
I beg to inform you that on Friday last the 22nd instant, the above appeal was dismissed with Costs to be taxed out of session, and the Conviction affirmed. The sentence was modified with two months in the second division for that of imprisonment with hard labour".
The reports of the
"Alfred Tiley appealed against a conviction by Mr Horace Smith, sitting at Westminster Police Court, and against a sentence of two months' hard labour for assaulting William Blanks. Mr Peter Grain appeared for the Commissioners of Police in support of the magistrate's decision; Mr A. Hutton was for the appellant. On Whit Monday the appellant and Blanks were in the Rose and Crown Public House, High-street, Lambeth, when they came to blows. The landlord separated them, and turned the appellant out, but Blanks remained in the house. It was alleged that later the appellant returned and without any further provocation struck Blanks a violent blow on the head with a stick, wounding him severely. For the appellant it was contended that he was acting in self defence; but the conviction was affirmed, with costs. In view of the appellant's good character, however, the sentence was altered to one of imprisonment in the second division instead of hard labour".
Little wonder, then, in later years, his Mother took to prowling the streets of Lambeth in search of her boy if he was late home!